Legal Opinion
Vartelas v. Water Resources Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1959PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendant, the water resources commission, acting under what is now § 25-3 (c) of the Revision of 1958, established, along the west bank of the Naugatuck River in Ansonia, a line beyond which, in the direction of the river, no structure or encroachment could be placed unless the commission specifically authorized it. The plaintiff was the executor of an estate which included a parcel of land affected by the commission’s action. The land is on the north side of Maple Street in Ansonia; it adjoined in part the north side of the westerly end of the bridge which, prior to the flood of August…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Morris County Land Improvement Co. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.