Legal Opinion

Johnson Bank v. Brandon Apparel Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 14, 2001No. 00-2839PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.

¶ 1. Brandon Apparel Group, Inc., Eric Lefkofsky, and Bradley Keywell (hereinafter "Brandon Apparel") appeal from a judgment granting Johnson Bank's motion for default judgment. Brandon Apparel contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by entering the judgment and concluding there was no oral extension agreement between the parties. The agreement would have allowed Brandon Apparel to delay its filing of a responsive pleading. We conclude that an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether or not an oral agreement existed, before a default judgment may be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Giese v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Connor v. ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. Luckett v. BodnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Luckett v. BodnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API