Legal Opinion

Connor v. Connor

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2001No. 99-0157, 99-1042PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. Sara Connor (defendant) petitions us to review a decision of the court of appeals that denied her relief from a default judgment entered against her. The circuit court, Judge Robert A. Kennedy presiding, entered the default judgment against her because she failed to serve her answer to a complaint filed by Anderson B. and Thelma A. Connor (plaintiffs) within the statutory deadline and failed to show excusable neglect for her untimely answer. We conclude that the record does not support a finding of excusable neglect or any basis for relief to reopen the default judgment. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Martin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Split Rock Hardwoods, Inc. v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LeitnerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Estate of Otto v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Miller v. Hanover InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Sukala v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API