Legal Opinion

Giese v. Giese

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1969No. 346PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

From the briefs and arguments of counsel we deem the basic issues to be:(1) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying the motion to enlarge the time to serve the complaint?(2) Was it prejudicial error to dismiss the complaint upon its merits?

The two principal procedural statutes involved are:

“262.12 Summons, what must accompany when served. (1) Personal Jurisdiction, (a) When personal or substituted personal service is made upon the defendant within this state, a copy of the complaint may or may not be served with the summons at the plaintiff’s option. If a copy of the complaint is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Johnson v. RetzlaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Banking Commission v. FlanaganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brown v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Town of Greenfield v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. WiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API