State v. Hampton
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
*460LUNDSTEN, J.
¶ 1. Corey Hampton appeals orders denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Hampton contends his plea colloquy was defective because the circuit court failed to personally inform him that the court was not bound by the terms of a plea agreement. Hampton asserts he made a prima facie showing under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his plea withdrawal motion. He contends the circuit court improperly denied that motion without an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that Hampton made a prima facie showing and that his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. McQuayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HamptonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State v. CHRISTOPHER L.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. WoznyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004