Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luckett v. Bodner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2009No. 2007AP308Published

1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 83. (dissenting). In affirming the decision of the court of appeals, the major*460ity seriously undermines the value of Wis. Stat. § 804.11(2) (2007-08)1 and rewrites the law on erroneous exercise of discretion. To understand the damage that is being done, we must examine the facts and law in full.

I

¶ 84. Chapter 804 in the Wisconsin Code of Civil Procedure pertains to "Depositions and Discovery." Wisconsin Stat. § 804.11, entitled "Requests for admission," is a vital part of this chapter.

¶ 85. Under Wis. Stat. § 804.11(l)(a), "a party may serve upon any other party a written request for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API