Legal Opinion
Young v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 22, 2002No. 01-1172PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Young filed a claim against DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“DaimlerChrysler”) alleging discrimination based on age and race in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of DaimlerChrysler. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
Background
In 1993, Young’s long-term employment at General Motors Corporation was eliminated as a result of corporate downsizing. He declined a separation package…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ignatius G. ANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Gail E. ABEITA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA MAILINGS, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Hazel M. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SODEXHO, CUMBERLAND COLLEGE CAFETERIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dixon v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- White v. Northern Michigan Regional HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- McCrary v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Seay v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Campbell v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Dickson v. Green Dot Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.