Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1991No. 90-3126PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
In this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, an Ohio state employee and a deceased Ohio state employee’s executrix appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants, who are directors of state retirement programs. The only issue on appeal is whether, as the district court held, plaintiffs brought their action after expiration of the relevant limitations period. We conclude that they did so, and now affirm.
I
Except as otherwise noted, the parties have stipulated to the facts as follows.
A. The State Retirement Systems
In Ohio, every employee of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Linda Jackson v. Quanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sheila J. Bell v. Ohio State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Lrl Properties v. Portage Metro Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Eunice Hollins v. Atlantic Company, Inc. Swagelok Company Crawford Fitting Company John Doe Companies, 1-100Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.