Legal Opinion

Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1987No. C3-86-2063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The wife in this marriage dissolution action appeals several issues from the judgment and amended judgment entered below. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Respondent Howard Petschel and appellant Eugenie de Rosier Petschel were married in 1972. They have three daughters, now ages 14, 12, and 10. Appellant commenced an action for dissolution in November 1984. On March 11, 1985, a temporary order was issued awarding appellant $819 per month child support, $400 per month temporary maintenance for one and one-half years, and $522 in temporary attorney’s fees.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HuntAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. State v. OstlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Paul v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marriage of Bolitho v. BolithoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API