Marriage of Paul v. Paul

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Husband and wife both appeal from an amended judgment and decree. She claims the trial court awarded the husband an inequitably excessive share of the parties’ marital property and should have awarded her permanent spousal maintenance. He asserts the property was divided inequitably in the wife’s favor and the court’s award of temporary spousal maintenance was not an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

FACTS

The 21-year marriage of appellant Elizabeth M. Paul and respondent David J. Paul was dissolved by judgment and decree entered April 7, 1986. The trial court…