Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Hunt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1995No. 93SC565, 93SC631PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari in In re Marriage of Hunt, 868 P.2d 1140 (Colo.App.1993), and in In re Marriage of Raimer, No. 92CA0759 (ColoApp. Aug. 5,1993), to determine whether pension increments based on post-dissolution increases in rank are included in determining what portion of a military pension is subject to division as marital property. In both cases, the court of appeals affirmed the trial courts’ deferred distribution of military pensions based on the “time rule” formula which includes distribution of benefits attributable to post-dissolution increases in rank. The petitioners, in both…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bullock v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BalansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. BORLEY v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Garcia v. GarciaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  4. Bloom v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In Re Marriage of MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API