Legal Opinion
Norman I. Krug Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. Praszker
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 1994No. A059808PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
and defendants Roman Praszker (Praszker) and West & Praszker Realtors, Inc. (West & Praszker) have filed a joint application for stipulated reversal of a judgment against the defendants as part of a settlement of the above action, which is now pending on appeal in this court.
For the reasons explained below, we will grant the request as to West & Praszker, but under the “extraordinary circumstances” exception to the rule pronounced in Neary v. Regents of the University of California (1992) 3 Cal.4th 273 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 859, 834 P.2d 119], we will deny the request as to defendant Roman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Brown v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- California Common Cause v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Muccianti v. Willow Creek Care CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hardisty v. HINTON & ALFERTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Clark v. Hiller (In Re Hiller)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Cummings Properties, LLC v. Dwyer (In Re Admetric Biochem, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.