Legal Opinion
Hardisty v. HINTON & ALFERT
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 4, 2005No. A107318PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
As part of the posttrial settlement of this action, all parties stipulated to vacate the judgment entered in by the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 25, 2004. To effectuate their stipulation, the parties filed in this court an “Application for Order Vacating Judgment” 1 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128, subdivision (a)(8). 2 The record is not complete and briefing on the noticed appeal and cross-appeal has not commenced.
We shall deny the motion to vacate the judgment.
FACTS
This nonjury case was tried over three days before Contra Costa County Superior Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Norman I. Krug Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. PraszkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Muccianti v. Willow Creek Care CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Union Bank of California v. Braille Institute of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Estate of RegliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Palmdale v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Contra Costa Cnty. Children v. J.D. (In re B.D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Marriage of Lee and Wong CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Meridian Financial etc. v. PhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Meridian Financial etc. v. PhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.