In re D.A.R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
D.A.R., a juvenile, appeals his judgment of probation for delinquent conduct. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements because they were inadmissible as a result of noncompliance with Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 51.095 and that he therefore was denied his due process rights. We reverse and remand.
Facts
D.A.R. was indicted for one count of delinquent conduct for carrying a firearm on school grounds. He was indicted for one count of delinquent conduct for possessing a firearm with an altered identification number. He initially pleaded not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. BraggsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Urquhart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Newbrough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re A.T.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.