Legal Opinion

In re D.A.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 2002No. 08-01-00075-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

D.A.R., a juvenile, appeals his judgment of probation for delinquent conduct. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements because they were inadmissible as a result of noncompliance with Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 51.095 and that he therefore was denied his due process rights. We reverse and remand.

Facts

D.A.R. was indicted for one count of delinquent conduct for carrying a firearm on school grounds. He was indicted for one count of delinquent conduct for possessing a firearm with an altered identification number. He initially pleaded not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. BraggsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Urquhart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  3. Newbrough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
  4. In re I.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In re A.T.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API