Legal Opinion
Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1958No. Civ. 9326PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring the rescission in fact of a contract whereby the predecessor in interest of plaintiff-respondent agreed to sell to Henry Thompson and Jack Edsell the merchantable timber upon land in Mendocino County.
The contract made August 15, 1949, read as follows:
“This agreement entered into between H. C. Crofoot (Seller) and Henry Thompson and Jack Edsell (Purchasers) this 15th day of August 1949, whereby Purchasers agree to pay $500 at above date, $5.00 a thousand stumpage (Spalding Scale) for all merchantable timber and $2.00 per thousand (Spalding Scale) for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beardsley v. ClemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Spadoni v. MaggentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Zelinger v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Nakash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as a Receiver of United States National Bank v. Air Florida System, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Air Florida System, Inc., Counter-Claimant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Counter-Defendant. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as a Receiver of United States National Bank v. Air Florida System, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.