Attorney Grievance Commission v. James
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner” or “Bar Counsel”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751Í&), 1 filed a petition for disciplinary or remedial action against respondent, Charles M. James, III, Esquire, on March 15, 2004, after revoking a Conditional Diversion Agreement 2 (“CDA”) with respondent. The Petition alleged that James, who was admitted to the Bar of this Court on January 4, 1993, violated several of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), specifically, l.l(Competence), 3 1.3 (Diligence), 4 1.4 (Communication), 5 1.15…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.