Legal Opinion

State v. Carthens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1973No. 18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

Though the record contains no assignments of error, the appeal is, itself, an exception to the judgment and presents for our consideration the question of whether any error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330; State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800; State v. Sloan, 238 N.C. 672, 78 S.E. 2d 738. We find no such error. The indictments were proper in form, the verdicts were properly returned and they support the sentences imposed. See, State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 S.E. 2d 19; G.S. 14-87.

Notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. LockettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API