Legal Opinion

State v. Lockett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1977No. 7612SC1047Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant presents two assignments of error for review. However, as to defendant’s first assignment, he concedes that there was “no error of consequence” and fails to support it in his brief with reason or authority. This assignment is therefore deemed abandoned. Rule 28(b) (3), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By his second assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment as of nonsuit made after the State rested and after the close of all the evidence. In reviewing a motion for judgment as of non-suit, the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. CarthensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API