Cleal v. Higginbotham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from. District Court, Alfalfa County; James W. Steen, Judas. . Proceedings by Lester Cleal and others against J. W. Higginbotham and others, on appeal from action of Board of County Commissioners of Alfalfa County approving the creation of a consolidated school district. The appeal was dismissed, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This, proceeding in error was instituted for the purpose of reviewing the action of the district court of Alfalfa county, dismissing an appeal from the action of the board of county commissioners of said county, which affirmed the action of the people and the county superintendent of public instruction in creating a consolidated school district, pursuant to section 1, article 7, chapter 219, Session Laws 1913. The contention of the plaintiffs in error is that such an appeal is provided for by section 7781, Rev. Laws 1910. The defendants in error contend that section 7781, supra, was repealed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Cohn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Garcia v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Woolsey v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowe v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Muskogee County v. Muskogee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- King v. State Ex Rel. GossettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.