Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1933No. 21183PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW®, J.

In the month of October, 1939, certain petitions purporting’ to be signed by a majority of the qualified voters of school districts Nos. 34 and 3© were presented to the county superintendent of Carter county, requesting the calling of an election for the purpose of organizing the territory comprising those school districts into a consolidated school district. The county superintendent declared the petitions to be sufficient and called an election as prayed for. From that order an appeal was attempted to the board of county commissioners. The county superintendent disregarded the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. School District No. 17 v. ZedikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Moede v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Newbern v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Murphy Bernabe v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975
  2. B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kostman v. Pine Lawn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights v. Division of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Grady v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API