Legal Opinion

Woolsey v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1914No. 5904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bozvles, Judge. A. B. Woolsey and others petitioned the county superintendent to change the boundaries of a school district, and, from a judgment against the petitioners by the district court to which the matter was taken on appeal by James Nelson and others from the action of the county commissioners sustaining an alteration of the district by the county superintendent, petitioners bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

On June 26, 1909, common school districts Nos. 49, 50, and 51, of Kay county, were reorganized and consolidated into school district Nó. 1. Thereafter a petition was filed with the county superintendent, requesting that he change the boundaries of said consolidated school district so as to exclude therefrom territory formerly composing school district No. 51, and form such territory into a separate school district. Certain parties, feeling aggrieved by the action of the county superintendent, secured a temporary injunction in the district court of Kay county, which injunction was afterwards…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evinger v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Davis v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Gregg v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. King v. State Ex Rel. O'reilly, Co. Atty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Common School District No. 49 v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API