Legal Opinion

King v. State Ex Rel. Gossett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 2, 1927No. 17353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto on the relation of the county attorney of Pushmataha county ágainst the consolidated schoo.1 district No. 5 et al., to dissolve the consolidated school district No. 5; rather to declare that such consolidated school district No. 5 was never legally organized.

On the trial of the case in the district court the defendants admitted in open court that the county superintendent did not prepare or post notices 'of his order forming the new district, and the trial court held that a failure to post the notices of the formation of a district deprived the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Cohn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Garcia v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. In Re Consolidation of School Districts Nos. 14 & 20Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. York v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API