Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Kids and Kin Head Start

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1985No. 16-83-02198; CA A31390PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Plaintiff is a former employe of defendant. In her second amended complaint she alleges that defendant terminated her employment without just cause, in violation of a provision of its employe handbook which was part of her contract of employment. See Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Publishing Co., 281 Or 651, 576 P2d 356 (1978). The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21A(8). Plaintiff failed to plead over and appeals the resulting judgment. We reverse and remand.

The complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Pub. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Simpson v. Western Graphics Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Perez-Denison v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  4. Lund v. Arbonne International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Acrymed, Inc. v. ConvatecDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API