Acrymed, Inc. v. Convatec
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ASHMANSKAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case centers around a new technology which incorporates silver, an infection-fighting compound, into a wound dressing. Both parties are asserting that the other stole confidential information or “trade secrets” and incorporated that information into their product.
Currently before the court are motions for summary judgment against virtually all of the claims and affirmative defenses asserted by the parties, with the exception of the affirmative defenses relating specifically to the patent infringement claim. Additionally, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. Coca Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- AssuredPartners of Oregon, LLC v. ReeseDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Commercial Fire Protection, LLC v. PiggDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Garfias v. Portland Spray Works, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Isosceles Holdings, LLC v. Alliance Environmental Group LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Opal Labs Inc. v. Sprinklr, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.