Legal Opinion

In re Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for an Order Permitting Christen Sveaas to Take Discovery from Dominique Levy, L & M Galleries & Other Non-Participants for Use in Actions Pending in the Norway

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 1, 2008No. M19-70PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Petitioner Christen Sveaas seeks an order (i) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a), compelling Respondents Dominique Levy (“Levy”) and L & M Galleries to provide discovery in conformance with an October 1, 2007 stipulation (the “Levy Application”); and (ii) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1728, compelling Respondent David Martinez (“Martinez”) to produce documents and appear at a deposition in aid of discovery for three actions that are pending in Norway and France (the “Martinez Application”). The present applications are before me…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. In Re Application of Alves BragaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  3. In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Narayanan v. Sutherland Global Holdings Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API