Legal Opinion

Burmester v. Horn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1917No. Civ. No. 2239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action brought to recover from him a sum of money paid by the plaintiffs on account of the purchase price of real and personal property situated in Sonoma County.

A brief account of the facts of the case is as follows: On January 14, 1913, Antonia Brandt, being the owner of the real property described in the complaint and of certain personal property, made a bill of sale and deed thereof to John W. Horn, the defendant, in consideration of which Horn entered into an agreement with her whereby within thirty days he was to pay her the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Melfi v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Chin Ott Wong v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Andrews v. KarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API