Andrews v. Karl
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action in ejectment to recover possession of real property in Orange County. The judgment, after adjudging plaintiff to be the owner, directs defendant to deliver possession upon the payment to him by plaintiff of one thousand dollars. Plaintiff, claiming that he is entitled to possession unconditionally, appeals from the judgment.
The outstanding facts, as shown by the findings, are substantially as follows: On November 7, 1913, plaintiff, being then the owner of the property, and defendant and one M. Neimark, executed a written contract whereby plaintiff, as the vendor, agreed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Gray v. PeltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Whittier v. StegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turney v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Pedrotti v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Kelso v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Barnes v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Paap v. Von HelmholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.