Hulland v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding under Business and Professions Code section 6083, subdivision (b) and rule 59(b) of the California Rules of Court to review a decision of the State Bar Disciplinary Board.
Local Administrative Committee Number 6 for Los Angeles County found that petitioner, Franklin Alfred Hulland, in violation of his oath and duties as an attorney, 1 wilfully neglected to render the services for which he was retained and used a confession of judgment and substitution of attorneys adversely to the interest of his client. 2 The committee recommended that petitioner be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Atlas Credit Corp. v. EzrineNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Isbell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Kallen v. DelugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hawk v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Law Offices of Dixon R. Howell v. ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.