Legal Opinion
In Re Winne
California Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13262PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The State Bar, through its local administrative committee for the county of Fresno, gave notice to Douglas Thompson Winne in the form of an order to show cause, that it would on May 23, 1928, at a certain time and place in the city of Fresno investigate certain conduct as shown in three separate specifications on the part, of said Winne as an attorney at law and a member of The State Bar, alleged to be in violation of his oath and duty as an attorney and counselor at law, involving moral turpitude, dishonesty and corruption. The investigation took place as noticed with said Winne…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cohen v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- In Re VaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Norton v. HoffmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sullivan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Meade v. State Collection Agency BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.