Legal Opinion
Cattin v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 8, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-8601PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Gary Cattin (“Cattin”) and Thomas Omans (“Omans”), are former employees of defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”). They both worked in the data processing department of GM for twenty-seven years before they were transferred to defendant Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”) on January 1, 1985. 1 GM had acquired EDS, a large data processing firm, as its wholly owned subsidiary in 1984. Plaintiffs were informed by GM and EDS in November 1984 that after they transferred to EDS on January 1, 1985, they would not be able to gain at EDS the three additional…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re White Farm Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Holliday v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cattin v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Lafian v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- McNabb v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Cattin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- 14 Employee Benefits Cas. 2769, 17 Ucc rep.serv.2d 583 Gary L. Cattin and Thomas F. Omans (90-1016), Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. General Motors Corporation (90-1051) Electronic Data Systems Corporation (90-1052), Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992