Cattin v. General Motors Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

For a more complete recitation of events that have led to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Supplemental Relief, see opinions in Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 955 F.2d 416 (6th Cir.1992), Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 641 F.Supp. 591 (E.D.Mich.1986), and Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 612 F.Supp. 948 (E.D.Mich.1985). Now, before me, is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Supplemental Relief *161in which I am asked to decide if plaintiff Gary L. Cattin (“Cattin”) should receive the entire grant of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) Class E Common Stock even though Cattin left…