Legal Opinion
McNabb v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 4, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-70455PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, employees or retirees of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (“Mich-Con” or “defendant”), claim that defendant violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461, the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“Elliott-Larsen Act”), Mich.Comp.Laws §§ 37.2201-37.2211, and the Michigan law of contract and promissory estoppel by unilaterally reducing life insurance benefits. Defendant moves for summary judgment. I have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441.
MichCon maintains group life insurance for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- In Re White Farm Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Nolan v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Holliday v. Xerox Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schalk v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- Cole v. Champion Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007
- Teamsters Local 251 v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 251District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
- Schwartz v. Interfaith Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Petersen v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988