Legal Opinion
Cattin v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1992No. Nos. 90-1016, 90-1051 and 90-1052PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Gary L. Cattin and Thomas F. Omans appeal a second time from the district court’s judgment holding that they are not entitled to early retirement benefits. Defendants General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”) cross-appeal from the district court’s ruling that plaintiffs are allowed to participate in a Stock Incentive Plan.
For the purpose of clarity, we have restated the five issues raised in this appeal by the plaintiffs as follows: (1) whether the Retirement Equity Act of 1984, amending 29 U.S.C. § 1054(g)(2)(A) and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Robert E. Kennedy, Jr. Joyce Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, William T. Hanton (85-3819), Frank Wszelaki (85-3827)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Coleman v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Marjorie G. Hickey, Leona Connelly and Bernard Keegan v. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Kohl v. Association of Trial Lawyers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Mitchell Sneed v. David DonahueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.