Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. Jacobs
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 30, 1995No. 16504-0-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFleisher, J.
The Pierce County Superior Court denied Thomas and Katherine O’Neills’ (the O’Neills) request for a trial de novo on an arbitration award on the grounds that the O’Neills had not timely served the opposing party. The O’Neills appeal. We reverse and remand for trial de novo.
Facts
On August 12, 1992, an arbitration award was filed with the clerk of the Pierce County Superior Court in favor of the Jacobses and Bo-Mac Gravel Company (the Jacobses). The award involved the Jacobses’ contract and tort dispute with the O’Neills.
Under Mandatory Arbitration Rule 7.1, an aggrieved party may request a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Kim v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.