Legal Opinion

Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1993No. 59876-2PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Appellants, Schaefco, Inc. and Wynco, Inc. (Schaefco), wish to develop property which is subject to the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 544 (Gorge Act). Their proposal to develop one lot in an intended larger development was rejected by the Columbia River Gorge Commission (Commission). The Commission *367was affirmed on appeal by the Clark County Superior Court. Because Schaefco has failed to timely perfect its appeal to this court, we dismiss.

On July 2,1991, the Superior Court entered its final order affirming the Commission's decision. Schaefco moved for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Moore v. WentzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Glass v. Windsor Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Shumway v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Pybas v. PaolinoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API