Marchant v. Hayes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
In this action, brought by the plaintiff Marchant for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon a certain building in Tuolumne county, a cross-complaint was filed by the defendant Hayes against his codefendant Chute, in which he claimed a lien upon the same property for labor done and materials furnished by him in the construction of the building. The court found that on June 18, 1894, Hayes entered into a contract in writing with Chute for the construction of the building for the sum of two thousand one hundred dollars, and agreed to complete the same according to certain plans and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bonesteel v. . the Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Prince v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.