Prince v. Hill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The records present an appeal from an order denying the defendants' motion for a new trial.
The plaintiffs sued to foreclose a lien for work done and materials furnished by them to the defendant, Whitcomb, in the erection by Whitcomb of a building upon the land of the defendants, William J. and Isabelle A. Hill. The contract between Whitcomb and the Hills was for more than one thousand dollars and, although in writing, was not recorded. It was therefore void with respect to lien claimants.
The plaintiffs agreed with Whitcomb to do the carpenter work and furnish certain materials for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Jewell v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- County of Imperial v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Akins v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- W. Harrison Price v. H. L. Coble Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.