Legal Opinion
Lane v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided June 10, 2005No. 1:06-m-00096PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, District Judge.
George René Lane (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”), David W. Presley (“Presley”), Christine C. Troianello (“Troianel-lo”), Walter Gibbons (“Gibbons”), and Claudia Stickney (“Stickney”) (collectively “Defendants”) alleging race discrimination, sex discrimination, age discrimination, and retaliation in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Before the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ivey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PBM Graphics Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Leong v. SAP America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Bolus v. Fleetwood RV, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- DiPaulo v. PotterDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.