Legal Opinion

Nichols Hills Bank v. McCool

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1985No. 51168-3PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Nichols Hills Bank appeals from a trial court judgment dismissing its claim against the marital community of Richard McCool, Jr., and Carole Elaine McCool. The bank contends the trial court erred by finding that: (1) Carole McCool did not ratify, authorize or consent to a guaranty agreement signed by her husband, (2) the bank could not reach Richard McCool's one-half interest in the McCool community property, and (3) the guaranty agreement precluded the bank from obtaining a lien on the McCool family residence.

In September 1979, Richard McCool III, the son of Rich ard McCool, Jr., and Carole…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. deElche v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pleas v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Haley v. HighlandWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API