Legal Opinion
Ridgeview Properties v. Starbuck
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1982No. 47109-6PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
This case is here on a direct appeal which we retained. It arises from a real estate transaction in Spokane County. Appellants Starbuck claim violations by respondent of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and breach of fiduciary duties. The trial court found to the contrary. We affirm.
Respondent Ridgeview Properties (Ridgeview) is a licensed real estate brokerage firm whose sole shareholders are Don Bunge and Larry Phillips. Bunge and Phillips are also joint owners of Bunge Construction, Inc.
In September 1977, appellants Charles and Diane Star-buck wanted to purchase a lot in the South…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Loew's Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of HallWashington Supreme Court · 1984
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.