Legal Opinion

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. Holman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1987No. 52556-1PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Cotrustee William M. Holman has challenged trial court findings and conclusions that his fees were excessive and must be repaid and that he must be removed as trustee. Several procedural matters concerning this appeal are also before the court. For reasons outlined below, we affirm the trial court. We also hold for the plaintiffs on all disputed motions.

The record in this case is voluminous. The Report of Proceedings is over 1,600 pages; there are at least 160 exhibits; over 300 pages of briefs and supplemental memo-randa; and 38 pages of findings and conclusions. Appellants Holman raise 41…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. May v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rice v. JanovichWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re the Personal Restraint GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API