Legal Opinion

Haley v. Highland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2000No. 67402-7PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 P.3d 119 (2000)

142 Wash.2d 135

J.T. HALEY, Respondent,

v.

Carl HIGHLAND, Petitioner.

No. 67402-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued December 9, 1999.

Decided November 2, 2000.

Leland Ripley, Seattle, Carl Highland, Bellevue, for Petitioner.

Jeffrey Thornton Haley, Bellevue, William Robert Bishin, Seattle, for Respondent.

MADSEN, J.

In deElche v. Jacobsen, 95 Wash.2d 237, 622 P.2d 835 (1980), and Keene v. Edie, 131 Wash.2d 822, 935 P.2d 588 (1997), we held that a tortfeasor's one-half interest in community property, both personal and real, may be reached to satisfy a judgment for a separate…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2002

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API