Legal Opinion

Pleas v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1989No. 54909-5PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Parkridge, a general partnership, seeks reversal of a Court of Appeals decision reversing a judgment against the City of Seattle in an action brought by Park-ridge for intentional interference with a business expectancy. We reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to the King County Superior Court.

The facts of this case are the same as those involved in Parkridge v. Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454, 573 P.2d 359 (1978), *796with some additional facts found by the trial court. Clerk's Papers, at 144-66.

In 1966 and 1967 Parkridge purchased property near Volunteer Park on Capitol Hill in Seattle with the intent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 44Washington Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API