Legal Opinion
General Shoe Corp. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 10, 1938No. 5298PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
This is a suit by appellee, Henry W. Hall, for damages resulting from the alleged breach of contract by appellant, General Shoe Corporation. Briefly stated, plaintiff pleaded that an oral agreement was made between him and defendant acting through salesmen, Freeman and Doherty, on the respective dates of May 15th and June 1st, 1935'; that under and by virtue of this agreement he was employed by defendant as exclusive agent, or granted the exclusive right to sell defendant's lines of “Fortune” and “Friendly” shoes in Longview; that in order to secure such exclusive agency,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Grand Prairie Gravel Co. v. Joe B. Wills Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- United Appliance Corp. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- International Shoe Co. v. HerndonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Gordon v. Emerson Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- International Shoe Co. v. LacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
- Portland Gasoline Co. v. Superior Marketing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Shaunty v. Burrus Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Staley v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949