Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Emerson Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1922No. 835PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Qtjinn, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff below, sued the Emerson Shoe Company and R. M. Richart for damages for breach of an alleged contract to sell plaintiff shoes.

• The following is taken, in substance, from appellant’s statement of the nature and result of the suit. This suit was brought by appellant against the Emerson Shoe Company and R. M. Richart, to recover the sum of $10,000 damages for breach of contract by appellees to furnish appellant $4,000 worth of shoes. In his petition appellant admitted an indebtedness to the appellee Emerson Shoe Company of $4,425.80, which he pleaded and asked that same…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Hume v. BogleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Berne v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Mooney v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API