United Appliance Corp. v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, Justice.
■ This appeal involves the plea of privilege. The issue before us is whether or not plaintiff’s petition and controverting .affidavit raise a sufficient issue of venue facts as against defendant’s plea of privilege and its general demurrer to plaintiff’s pleadings.
The parties will be referred to through■out this opinion as they appeared in the •trial court.
Plaintiff’s controverting affidavit, which ■embraced his original petition, discloses that defendant is a corporation; that early in January of 1936 plaintiff went to Fort Worth, the place of defendant’s general office in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Southern Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Garza v. KenedyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Lakeside Irrigation Co. v. Markham Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Bragg v. Houston Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Admiral Motor Hotel of Texas, Inc. v. Community Inns of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Howell v. Murray Mortgage Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
- Morgan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Gaede v. SK Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.