Legal Opinion

Aguayo v. Amaro

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 2013No. B231194PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

Sofia Aguayo appeals a judgment against her and in favor of Michelle Amaro, the special administrator of the estate of Isabel Infante. Sofia1 and Amaro both sought to quiet title to real property located at 3665 Gillig Avenue in Los Angeles (the property). After a bench trial, the court determined that the property belonged to the estate on the ground that Sofia was barred from asserting adverse possession of the property under the doctrine of unclean hands.

The primary issues on appeal are whether unclean hands can serve as a defense to adverse possession by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza CollectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Collins v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. Ditzian v. Unger, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Aerotek v. Johnson Group Staffing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API