Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1986No. 8620SC365PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motions for a continuance at the commencement of his trial. Defendant did not submit an affidavit in support of these motions. Counsel for defendant simply stated that he needed time to examine what had been produced in discovery. In particular, counsel stated that he needed additional time in order to obtain an independent chemical analysis of the white powder sold to Agent Hawkins.

Defendant contends on appeal that because the court refused to grant his motions for a continuance, he was denied his constitutional right to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Powell v. Peachtree Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. Anthony GeneralCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. StittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API