Powell v. Peachtree Fasteners, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant brings forward three assignments of error. We reverse the entry of directed verdict against defendant on the promissory note. Plaintiffs bring forward seven assignments of error. As to plaintiffs’ appeal, we affirm. Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial to determine the issue of defendant’s alleged liability on the promissory note.
Defendant’s Appeal
I
In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by granting plaintiffs’ motion for directed verdict on the promissory note. We agree.
Defendant argues…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Meiselman v. MeiselmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Tin Originals, Inc. v. Colonial Tin Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duke Energy International, L.L.C. v. NapoliDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. v. HanachiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- In re: C.D.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- In re: C.D.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021