Legal Opinion

State v. Anthony General

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1988No. 8816SC154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendants first contend the trial court erred by denying defendant Robeson the right to cross-examine or question Sergeant Edwards or to present evidence during a voir dire hearing. At trial, when Sergeant Edwards was asked on direct examination by the prosecutor whether he questioned defendants, defendant Robeson’s counsel requested a voir dire hearing. The trial judge asked defendant Robeson’s counsel what the purpose of the voir dire was, and counsel responded, “. . . I didn’t know what he was getting ready to say about the statements. ... He was getting ready to say…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PASTUERCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API